US Bar Exam vs SQE: Which Is Harder? (Honest Comparison)
- 1Pass Rates: The Numbers
- 2SQE Pass Rates
- 3US Bar Exam Pass Rates (2024 NCBE Data)
- 4Format: How the Exams Differ
- 5US Bar Exam (UBE) — Two Days
- 6SQE1 — Two Days (Two Separate Sittings)
- 7SQE2 — Practical Assessments
- 8Subject Overlap: What Transfers and What Doesn't
- 9The Foreign Legal System Problem
- 10Three concrete examples:
- 11Preparation Time
- 12Bar Exam: Standard Prep
- 13SQE1: Realistic Prep for US Lawyers
- 14Cost Comparison
- 15US Bar Exam
- 16SQE (converted at £1 = $1.27)
- 17Verdict by Profile
- 18The Honest Verdict
- 19Further Reading
US Bar Exam vs SQE: Which Is Harder?
Quick verdict: SQE1 passes 41% of candidates. The July 2024 UBE sitting passed 68%. On raw numbers, SQE1 is harder. But raw pass rates miss the point. For a US lawyer, the SQE is harder primarily because it tests an entirely foreign legal system — and no amount of prior legal experience fully compensates for that.
Pass Rates: The Numbers
Before comparing format and difficulty, ground the comparison in actual data.
SQE Pass Rates
| Exam | Pass Rate | Period |
|---|---|---|
| SQE1 (both FLK1 and FLK2) | 41% | July 2025 |
| SQE1 FLK1 only | ~55% | July 2025 |
| SQE1 FLK2 only | ~57% | July 2025 |
| SQE2 | ~78% | 2024/25 |
SQE1's 41% overall pass rate is among the lowest of any major professional qualifying exam in England and Wales. See our full pass rates analysis for the complete picture.
US Bar Exam Pass Rates (2024 NCBE Data)
| Sitting | Overall Pass Rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| July 2024 (UBE) | 68% | ~50,620 takers |
| February 2024 (UBE) | 43% | ~19,816 takers — skewed by repeat takers |
| Full year 2024 | 61% | All 70,436 takers across all jurisdictions |
| California July 2024 | 53.8% | California uses its own exam, not UBE |
Why February looks so much lower: The February bar sitting draws a much higher proportion of repeat takers, which depresses the overall rate. The July sitting — dominated by recent law graduates — is the more representative comparison point.
State variation matters. The UBE has been adopted by 41 jurisdictions, but pass rates vary sharply. First-time taker pass rates in 2024: Pennsylvania 82.6%, Maryland 74%, Minnesota ~88%. California (not UBE) sits at 53.8% for July first-timers. The numbers depend heavily on who is sitting.
Note: The standard UBE passing score of 266 is due to change from July 2026 onwards, when the NCBE introduces the NextGen Bar Exam.
Format: How the Exams Differ
The exams are structured very differently, and format has a direct effect on how you prepare.
US Bar Exam (UBE) — Two Days
| Component | Format | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| MBE — Multistate Bar Examination | 200 questions administered; 175 scored | 50% |
| MEE — Multistate Essay Examination | 6 essays, 30 minutes each | 30% |
| MPT — Multistate Performance Test | 2 tasks, 90 minutes each | 20% |
The MBE covers seven subjects: Contracts, Torts, Criminal Law, Constitutional Law, Evidence, Real Property, and Civil Procedure.
What this means in practice: The bar exam is compensatory — a strong essay performance can offset a weaker MCQ section. The MPT tests practical lawyering: read source documents, identify legal issues, produce usable work product. These skills translate directly from law school and practice.
The UBE passing score is 266 out of 400 in most jurisdictions (some set it higher at 270).
SQE1 — Two Days (Two Separate Sittings)
| Component | Format | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FLK1 | 180 MCQs, 5 hours | 50% of SQE1 |
| FLK2 | 180 MCQs, 5 hours | 50% of SQE1 |
The SQE1 pass mark is set using the Angoff method, typically falling around 56–60% correct. Critically, both FLK1 and FLK2 must be passed independently — this is a non-compensatory model.
What this means in practice: There is no essay to fall back on. Every question has one correct answer. You cannot demonstrate partial understanding or rescue a weak section with a strong performance elsewhere. The NCBE itself has described the SQE as having "similar difficulty" to the US bar exam — but the non-compensatory structure makes SQE1 less forgiving.
SQE2 — Practical Assessments
| Assessment | Format |
|---|---|
| Client interview + attendance note | Oral + written |
| Advocacy and persuasive written argument | Oral + written |
| Case and matter analysis | Written |
| Legal research and written advice | Written |
| Legal drafting | Written |
Pass rate: ~78%. Significantly more forgiving than SQE1.
For US lawyers, SQE2 is where prior legal experience genuinely helps. Client interviewing, structured legal analysis, drafting — these skills transfer. The challenge is applying them within the English legal context, not the skills themselves.
Subject Overlap: What Transfers and What Doesn't
The MBE tests seven subjects. Here is how they map to SQE1 content:
| MBE Subject | SQE1 Equivalent | Overlap |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts | Contract Law | High — shared common law foundations |
| Torts | Tort Law | High — conceptual structure is the same; cases differ |
| Criminal Law | Criminal Law and Practice | Medium — same foundations, different procedure entirely |
| Real Property | Land Law + Property Practice | Low — English land law is a distinct system |
| Constitutional Law | Constitutional and Admin Law | Low — no written constitution; parliamentary sovereignty |
| Evidence | (Tested in SQE2 context) | Medium |
| Civil Procedure | Dispute Resolution | Low — CPR is very different from FRCP |
Beyond the MBE subjects, SQE1 also covers areas with no MBE equivalent at all:
- Solicitors Accounts (SRA Accounts Rules — entirely specific to English practice)
- Trusts and Equity (a distinct conceptual framework)
- Business Law and Practice (English company law)
- Wills, Intestacy and Probate (English succession law)
Honest summary: Contracts and Torts transfer reasonably well. Criminal Law transfers partly. Land Law, Constitutional Law, Civil Procedure, and several SQE-only subjects are effectively new subjects requiring full study from scratch.
The Foreign Legal System Problem
This is the factor that raw pass rate comparisons do not capture.
When a US law student sits the bar exam, they are tested on law they studied for three years. The subjects are familiar. The terminology is familiar. The approach to legal reasoning is familiar. Preparation is revision, not learning.
When a US attorney sits SQE1, they are tested on a different country's statutes, cases, terminology, and — in areas like land law and equity — entirely different conceptual frameworks. Preparation is learning, not revision.
Three concrete examples:
Solicitors Accounts. The SRA Accounts Rules govern how English solicitors handle client money. There is no US equivalent. Every candidate learns this from scratch — but UK students have spent three years in an environment where solicitor practice is constantly discussed. US lawyers have not.
Land Law. The distinction between legal and equitable interests, the Land Registration Act 2002, overriding interests, leasehold structures — none of these have meaningful analogues in US property law. You are not applying a familiar framework in a new context. You are learning a new framework.
Constitutional Law. England has no written constitution. Parliamentary sovereignty — not judicial supremacy — governs the relationship between Parliament and the courts. The Human Rights Act 1998 provides rights protection, but it operates differently from the US Bill of Rights. US constitutional law training is not merely unhelpful here: it can actively mislead you if you apply the same analytical framework to English constitutional questions.
Preparation Time
Bar Exam: Standard Prep
For a recent US law graduate: 8–10 weeks full-time after graduation, using a commercial bar review course (Themis, Kaplan, BARBRI). For a repeat taker: 6–12 weeks depending on the gap.
SQE1: Realistic Prep for US Lawyers
Provider guidance typically suggests 3–6 months. For UK law graduates coming straight from the LLB, that is probably accurate. For US lawyers, the realistic range is different:
| Your situation | Realistic prep time |
|---|---|
| US practice area overlaps well with SQE1 subjects | 4–6 months at 15+ hrs/week |
| Low overlap (e.g. US criminal attorney covering land law + trusts) | 6–9 months at 10–15 hrs/week |
| Studying while working full-time | 9–12 months |
The key variable is unfamiliar subjects. You cannot rush learning land law or equity — you have to understand the conceptual frameworks before the MCQs become answerable.
For SQE2: US lawyers with litigation or transactional experience typically need 2–3 months, focused on English law content and procedure rather than the practical skills.
Cost Comparison
US Bar Exam
| Item | Cost |
|---|---|
| Bar exam fee (UBE state) | $750–$1,200 |
| Commercial bar review course | $1,500–$3,500 |
| Character and fitness application | $200–$600 |
| MPRE | $125 |
| Total (first attempt, UBE state) | ~$2,600–$5,400 |
SQE (converted at £1 = $1.27)
| Route | GBP | USD |
|---|---|---|
| Exam fees (SQE1 + SQE2) | £4,908 | ~$6,233 |
| Self-study materials only | £500–£1,500 | ~$635–$1,905 |
| Budget course (QLTS School) | £2,500–£3,500 | ~$3,175–$4,445 |
| Mid-range (BARBRI SQE) | £5,899 | ~$7,492 |
| Premium (BPP, University of Law) | £12,000–£15,000 | ~$15,240–$19,050 |
| Route | USD total (exam fees + prep) |
|---|---|
| Budget (self-study) | ~$6,868–$8,138 |
| Mid-range (BARBRI) | ~$13,725 |
| Premium | ~$21,473–$25,283 |
Verdict: The bar exam is significantly cheaper. An expensive bar review course plus fees comes to approximately $5,000–$6,000. The SQE minimum is approximately $7,000–$8,000, with mid-range and premium routes costing two to four times more.
Use our cost calculator to model your SQE costs including potential resit fees.
Verdict by Profile
Different candidates will experience the comparison differently:
Recent US law graduate, strong grades, overlapping subjects The bar exam is probably harder on a day-to-day preparation basis. You are taking SQE1 knowing the US system well; you are building from a foundation. Still need 6+ months of serious preparation.
US attorney, 5+ years in corporate/commercial practice SQE1 is harder — your experience doesn't map onto English law subjects, and you are studying around a full-time job. SQE2, however, is manageable. The practical skills are genuinely transferable.
US attorney, criminal law background SQE1 is significantly harder. Criminal procedure transfers partially, but the SQE1 syllabus includes land law, trusts, solicitors accounts, and wills — none of which map to your experience. Budget 9–12 months.
Anyone sitting California bar (not UBE) California's 53.8% July pass rate makes it a closer comparison to SQE1's 41% than the UBE's 68%. On raw numbers, the California bar and SQE1 are in the same difficulty bracket.
The Honest Verdict
Is SQE1 harder than the bar exam in absolute terms? Almost certainly yes. A 41% pass rate versus 68% (July UBE) is a meaningful gap, and the SQE cohort is not a weak group — it includes UK law graduates and internationally qualified lawyers.
Is SQE1 harder for US lawyers specifically? Yes, and significantly so. The bar exam tests what you learned in law school. SQE1 tests what you have to teach yourself.
Is SQE2 harder than the bar's practical components (MPT)? Probably not. US lawyers with real practice experience consistently find SQE2 more manageable than SQE1. The skills transfer; the English law content is the challenge.
The right mindset: Do not go in thinking SQE1 will be easy because it is "just MCQs." SQE1 MCQs require precise application of English law rules. If you don't know the rules — and you won't until you study them — the MCQ format does not help you.
Treat SQE1 as learning a foreign legal system, allocate serious study time to unfamiliar subjects, and use a preparation course designed for international lawyers. That is the path.
Further Reading
- SQE for US Attorneys: Complete Guide 2026
- SQE Pass Rates: Full Analysis
- SQE Provider Comparison
- Cost Calculator
Free revision timetable
Build a personalised day-by-day SQE study plan based on your exam date and weekly hours.
Key takeaway
SQE1 has a lower pass rate than the US bar exam (41% vs ~68% on the July UBE sitting). But for US lawyers, the SQE is harder for a more fundamental reason: it tests an entirely foreign legal system. You are not revising — you are learning from scratch.
Share this article
Written by The Qualified Path Team
The Qualified Path team is dedicated to providing accurate, up-to-date guidance for aspiring solicitors. Our content is thoroughly researched and regularly updated to reflect the latest SRA requirements and best practices.
Related Articles
Dual Qualifying US & UK: Is It Worth It in 2026?
An honest analysis of whether dual qualification as a US attorney and English solicitor is worth the time and cost investment in 2026. Salary data, practice area analysis, career paths, and a straight answer on when to do it - and when not to.
SQE for US Attorneys: Complete Guide 2026
Everything US-qualified attorneys need to know about sitting the SQE in 2026. Costs in USD, subject difficulty, QWE options, provider recommendations, and exam locations outside the UK.
SQE vs LPC 2026: Which Route to Become a Solicitor? (LPC Ended 2021)
LPC closed September 2021 - SQE is now your only option. Full comparison: SQE costs £4,908 vs LPC £20k+, SQE1 41% pass rate vs LPC 85%. Complete guide for aspiring solicitors.
Still unsure how to approach this?
I offer structured 1:1 SQE strategy sessions - 45 minutes, online. Whether you're deciding on a provider or want a second opinion on your study plan.
Found This Helpful?
Explore more resources and use our calculators to plan your SQE journey.